The Smart Factory Bottleneck Is the Interfaces, Not the Model
Plant AI stalls where the MES, the historian, the PLCs, the ERP and the floor disagree about what a part or a batch is, so owning that shared vocabulary matters more than a smarter model.
Manufacturing
A lot of what limits a shop happens away from the machines: the RFQ waiting on the one person who can price it, the print revision checked from memory, the setup only one operator knows. That’s document work, it repeats every day, and most of it never shows up in the ERP.
Standard work
On the floor, standard work is the current best way to do a job. It’s written down, everyone follows it, and it changes on purpose when someone finds a better way. Plenty of shops have that for the machines and still run the office on memory, so the quote, the print check and the setup notes depend on who happens to be in that day.
An Operating Standard is the same discipline for the knowledge work. It’s a written record of how your quotes, prints, instructions and reports get handled, kept in plain files the company owns, and your people and your AI tools both work from it.
Holden’s father was a hands-on manufacturing operations consultant who moved machines, changed processes and standardized work. He re-engineered the physical operation, and we re-engineer the information operation.
The sheet in words
The work
The system reads, checks and drafts. A person approves anything that goes to a customer or out to the floor.
An RFQ comes in as an email, a PDF or a print. Someone decides whether it’s worth quoting, finds a comparable past job, checks material and capacity, prices it and writes it up, and often all of that waits on one person.
Someone has to check each new revision against the bill of materials, catch the callout that changed between revs, and confirm the traveler matches the current print. It’s careful work, easy to rush at the end of a shift, and expensive when something gets missed.
PPAP packages, first-article reports, material certs and supplier trackers are the paperwork a customer or an auditor asks for, and they usually live in folders and spreadsheets that drift out of date.
Some setups only one person knows how to run, and some travelers say less than the operator knows. Writing it down has always been the right idea, and it has always lost to the next hot job.
Customer quirks, supplier workarounds and the reason a job runs the way it does tend to sit with a few experienced people, and they leave when those people do.
The ERP holds the numbers, but the view people need gets rebuilt by hand in a spreadsheet every week or every month-end.
Quoting
Every shop quotes a little differently, so treat this as the general shape. The model reads and drafts, code handles the lookups and the math, and your estimator approves every quote.
Step by step
What it’s worth
We agree with you up front on how to measure the process and record how it runs today, so no improvement gets claimed without a before-measurement. Then we judge the result three ways, and we don’t count the same gain twice.
Whether the people you already have can take on more quotes and releases without one person setting the pace.
Whether you get useful work you weren’t getting before, like the RFQ that used to go unquoted, the work instruction that never got written, or the report nobody had time to build.
Whether a quote carries its reasoning and a revision change gets caught the same way every time, and whether the work keeps moving through a vacation or a retirement because less of it depends on what one person remembers.
When there are results worth publishing, they’ll appear here with their source.
How we work
Every engagement is scoped independently, so there’s no fixed package and no published price. The order of the steps stays the same. Conversations are always free.
Every step in detailOP 010
You getWhether it’s worth doing
Walk us through the process that keeps stalling: what comes in, who touches it, what goes out and how often. If it isn’t worth your money, we’ll say so.
OP 020
You getAn agreed first process
When the first conversation shows a real path, this is usually the next step, and it’s typically free too. We walk the job with the people who own it, at the whiteboard, at their desks and out on the floor, and agree on what a better result would look like. If you’d rather begin with an Opportunity Assessment, which is half a day to a full day on site and a written plan you keep either way, we can start there instead.
OP 030
You getA written scope you approve
We write the first project down in plain language: the process, the result we’re after, what’s left out, and how we’ll test that it’s done. We also agree with you on how to measure the process as it runs today, and you approve the scope before any work starts.
OP 040
You getGo, change course or stop
When it isn’t clear that your documents can support a reliable result, we test that first on your real prints and jobs in a small paid step. It ends with a written go, change course or stop, and stop is an acceptable answer.
OP 050
You getA foundation the company owns
We set up your Operating Standard in your company’s accounts under your logins, with passwords kept in your password manager. Your IT provider is in the loop from the start, and two of your own people can reach everything without us.
OP 060
You getA working process, measured against the old way
We build it at the desks of the people who do the work, on real jobs. They decide where a person checks the result, and those checkpoints stay. The new way runs next to the old one until the results match, and you get a clear view of progress plus a short written update on a regular schedule, reviewed by Holden before it’s sent.
OP 070
You getPeople who can run it
We train your team inside the company, in the room first and then at each person’s station. Your Champions, the people who will own the system, learn to change it themselves.
OP 080
You getThe code, instructions, settings and accounts
We’re done when your people have shown they can run it, fix it and change it without us. Ongoing support, which we call Cadence, is optional and month to month, and you can cancel any month.
Your systems
Nobody needs a second system of record. What we build sits next to the ERP you already run. It reads from approved views and exports, writes back only through paths your team has approved and tested, and leaves the ERP in charge of its own records.
When there’s a better way in, like an interface the ERP vendor supports, we try it on your data before we build on it.
Field notes
Our deepest work so far has been inside West Michigan manufacturers. These are patterns from that work, written generally so no client can be recognized.
Part of it is judgment about whether to chase the job, what the risk is and what the customer will accept. The rest is mechanics, like reading the print, building the parts list and pulling current prices. The mix differs from shop to shop, and either way we keep the judgment with the estimator and build the mechanics around them.
When someone on your team has already built a tool that works, we don’t start over. We make sure the company owns it, meaning the source, the accounts and the instructions to rebuild it, and the old version keeps running until its new home is proven.
A report someone rebuilds by hand every week or every month-end is often a good first project. The numbers already exist, the person who builds it knows what right looks like, and the work never touches the ERP’s records.
Your IT provider, your email and file systems, and your customers’ confidentiality terms decide what an AI tool may read. We settle that early, and customer drawings get a decision before any AI reads them.
When nobody knows yet whether your documents can support a reliable result, a small paid test on real jobs answers the question. Learning that early beats learning it halfway through a build, and when the answer is stop, we say so.
Some of what matters lives with the people doing the work and never made it into a document. They check that the system has understood it before anyone relies on it, and their corrections go into the Operating Standard.
We don’t publish a client name, a logo or a result without the client’s sign-off, and every number we publish has a source.

Who you’ll work with
Founder and principal
He’s the person you work with, from the first conversation through handoff, and the working sessions happen on site with the people who do the work.
The honest list
We’d rather say it early, before you spend anything.
Further reading
Longer pieces on the same problems, each written to be useful whether or not you ever call us.
All articlesPlant AI stalls where the MES, the historian, the PLCs, the ERP and the floor disagree about what a part or a batch is, so owning that shared vocabulary matters more than a smarter model.
Nobody outside your plant is testing AI against your production line, so you build the acceptance test yourself, with a frozen baseline and a number written down before you look.
Score candidate projects on business value, workflow fit, evidence, measurable outcomes, risk and ownership.
An assessment should leave you with measured processes, ranked opportunities, a list of what not to build, and a brief for the first project.
Questions
No. The ERP stays the system of record. What we build reads from it through approved views and exports and writes back only through paths your team has approved and tested.
Those features work inside one vendor’s product, and some of them are worth using. The work that stalls usually crosses systems and people: the RFQ in email, the print on a shared drive, the costs in the ERP and the judgment in an estimator’s head. We build around how your company does that work, write it into an Operating Standard you own, and leave the ERP in charge of its records. If a tool you already pay for covers the job, we’ll tell you to use it.
Someone who can make decisions, the people who do the work we’re looking at, one or two people who will own it afterward (we call them Champions), and your IT provider. The people who do the work matter most, because the system is built around how they do it.
Only once you’ve decided it can. Customer drawings often come with confidentiality terms, so we work out with you and your IT provider which documents an AI service may read, and where, before anything reads them. If a customer agreement rules something out, it stays out.
One process with a clear start and end, like an RFQ going from the inbox to a reviewed draft, or a recurring report rebuilt from ERP exports with its checks written in code. It’s scoped in writing before work starts, and when the outcome is uncertain it starts with a small paid feasibility step.
Any result we claim is compared with how the process ran before, measured the way we agreed with you at the start. We look at the capacity it gives back, the quality of the work and the review and correction it takes, and every number we report has a source.
Every engagement is scoped independently and quoted directly, and you approve the scope before work starts. Conversations are always free, and when the first conversation shows a real path, the working session after it is typically free too.
Tell us which job in the office waits longest on one person, and we’ll tell you whether AI can help.